http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20080417/adobe-web-photo-site-is-great-for-editing-but-lacks-some-basics/ from The Wall Street Journal Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:56:01 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20080417/adobe-web-photo-site-is-great-for-editing-but-lacks-some-basics/comment-page-1/#comment-1222 Marc Savoy Sun, 20 Apr 2008 04:36:38 +0000 http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20080417/adobe-web-photo-site-is-great-for-editing-but-lacks-some-basics/#comment-1222 Only $80?? Wow. That's cheap at twice the price. Let's see, Extrapolate this approach by the 30+ highly recommended, useful web apps I've downloaded for free and I'm out a cool $2400. Way to go! Only $80?? Wow. That’s cheap at twice the price.
Let’s see, Extrapolate this approach by the 30+ highly recommended, useful web apps I’ve downloaded for free and I’m out a cool $2400. Way to go!

]]> http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20080417/adobe-web-photo-site-is-great-for-editing-but-lacks-some-basics/comment-page-1/#comment-1219 Dave Barnes Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:42:18 +0000 http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20080417/adobe-web-photo-site-is-great-for-editing-but-lacks-some-basics/#comment-1219 I don't get it. Why deal with web-based software when Photoshop Elements only costs $80 USD? More features and faster. And, you don't need to be connected to the web. I don’t get it.
Why deal with web-based software when Photoshop Elements only costs $80 USD?
More features and faster.
And, you don’t need to be connected to the web.

]]>