Symantec Rewrites Its Security Suite To Curb Nuisances
It can be awful to have your Windows computer infected with malicious software, but it is almost as bad suffering the daily burdens imposed by the security software designed to protect you.
Too often, security programs significantly slow down the computer, causing lags in booting up the machine, launching programs and receiving email. Not only that, they can be incredibly annoying, popping up frequent messages or asking questions in techie lingo.

The main screen of the 2009 version of Norton Internet Security is streamlined and even includes a gauge to show much drain the security program is placing on the computer.
Now, Symantec (SYMC) has decided to radically rewrite its main security suite for Windows to directly address these problems. And in my tests, this new product, Norton Internet Security 2009, largely succeeded. It isn’t perfect, but it is the fastest, simplest and least obtrusive security suite I have ever used.
Being quick and quiet is great, but, of course, a security product also has to be effective against the vast number of viruses, spyware programs and other malicious attacks aimed at Windows. I don’t have a security lab in which to test such effectiveness. But PC Magazine does, and the magazine called the new Norton suite’s spyware and virus protection “extremely effective.” The magazine’s tests are described at http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2330024,00.asp.
However, I wasn’t impressed with Norton’s optional antispam feature, which caused the only significant problem I ran into in my testing.
The new suite costs $70, and can be purchased at symantec.com and elsewhere. For that price, you get to install it on three PCs and you get a one-year subscription to its updates, which cost $60 thereafter.
Symantec is now including free support, even over the phone, though in my tests this support proved lousy. Norton Internet Security 2009 works only on Windows XP and Windows Vista.
I tested the new security suite on a Dell (DELL) desktop running Vista and on a Macintosh laptop running Windows XP as a “virtual machine,” meaning Windows and Windows programs ran simultaneously with the Mac operating system. Symantec assured me the program would run properly in this latter setup, and I had run the previous version of Norton successfully in the same environment.
The first thing you notice about NIS 2009 is the fast and simple installation. The process took under two minutes on each of my test machines.
File scanning is also much faster, partly because the new suite has a feature called Insight that allows it to skip the scanning and rescanning of many of your files. Insight gathers information about your installed programs and compares them against a list of programs Symantec knows are “trusted,” through either its own research or through scanning results voluntarily submitted by other users. These trusted programs are then exempted from future scans, saving a ton of time.

The new Norton suite has a feature called Insight which calculates how many of your programs it knows are trusted, and therefore needn’t be scanned repeatedly, saving time.
For instance, on my Dell running Vista, an immediate complete scan done before Insight analyzed the computer took more than an hour. But after Insight determined that over 70% of my programs were trusted, complete scans took 10 minutes or less. Of course, your data files, like Word documents and emails, still must be scanned, because they are typically unique.
To minimize the impact on users, the new Norton does scanning and other tasks only when it detects that the computer has been idle for at least 10 minutes. And new virus definitions trickle into your computer invisibly, in the background, rather than all at once in a major process.
Symantec is so certain that its product has a low impact on PC performance that it built a gauge into its new streamlined main screen that shows its drain on the main processor, or CPU.
NIS 2009 is also far less annoying than other suites I’ve used. In normal operation, it notifies you only when it has completed a background task or if there’s a threat or a repair that requires a user action, such as a reboot. And there’s an even quieter optional “silent mode” that can turn off nearly every nonurgent activity of Norton for up to six hours. Silent Mode is automatically activated during full-screen activities, such as playing games or watching movies.
The new suite has a bunch of other features, including a browser toolbar for Internet Explorer and Firefox that warns against fake and malicious Web pages, and that can securely enter your passwords and other information on Web sites. It also has an antispam feature for Microsoft (MSFT) Outlook and Outlook Express.
This antispam feature, which is off by default, was rated as weak by PC Magazine and, in my tests, it caused both Norton and Outlook Express to crash repeatedly in Windows XP running on my Mac. Symantec suspects this is a problem particular to running Windows the way I was on the Mac. After I reinstalled Norton and turned off the feature, all was well again.
But Symantec’s free tech-support service was not only unable to diagnose the problem, it didn’t even know the difference between Outlook and Outlook Express.
Despite this one glitch, I can recommend Norton Internet Security 2009 as a good way to protect your Windows computer with minimal impact on your time and attention.
Find all of Walt Mossberg’s columns and videos online, free, at the All Things Digital Web site, walt.allthingsd.com. Email him at mossberg@wsj.com.





Comments
I used to use Norton and switched to AVG freeware, then Mcafee couple years back. Reading all the reviews, I switched back to Norton 2009. Its amazing!!! Its even better than the freewares that I tried. Norton 2009 does not feel like a Norton product ..It feels like this whole new product– fast and sleek. Highly recommended. I have posted my review at cnet as well.
Posted by david zimmern at September 18th, 2008 at 12:27 amWalt-
A lot of people who consider themselves to be “techies” have completely abandoned suites such as the new offering from Symantec. I am not a “techie”, but I am among them.
We have taken this action because of the suffocating effect of the suites. Now, in spite of the best efforts of Symantec and their peers, we will not be back. Just check the various forums.
What we are doing, and quite successfully, is using the free offerings of Avast and AVG (free only because it appears that even they sell only suites), the Windows two way firewall Windows Defender, the monthly Microsoft Anti-spyware tool, and the hardware firewall afforded by our routers. Some people are even using a router with no network, as this is an easy and relatively cheap way to get that hardware firewall.
Posted by Richard Mitnick at September 18th, 2008 at 4:18 amI think this signals the beginning of long-needed changes in the security software market, and hopefully for software overall. I am a techie and have tried various security suites and individual tools over the years, from AVG to ZoneAlarm. They all made my system feel like a bloated pig. Norton 2009 was recently in beta and I gave it a spin. I was totally blown away by how quick it was to set up, and it definitely feels more lightweight than any other security suite I’ve used. My system didn’t feel any slower at all. Actually, it felt faster because I replaced a slower product which shall remain nameless [rhymes with "terse key"]. Hopefully other software vendors will wake up and realize that we techies (and lots of regular folks too) don’t want bloat. I think Google gets the idea with their Chrome web browser. Microsoft and Apple are you listening?
Posted by Jonah Wittberg at September 18th, 2008 at 10:16 amNIS2009 sounds much better than the Norton 360 I’m using now, but I may just be too fed up to stay with Norton when my subscription expires. If Norton offered a free upgrade to existing customers I would at least be able to see if it makes me happy again.
Just last week, I tried to upgrade from Firefox 2 to 3 and when that didn’t work, I tried to install Google Chrome which didn’t work either. It took me several hours to find out that the culprit was the Norton firewall. Turning it off and the Windows firewall on, and then rebooting, allowed me to install both browsers.
But my biggest complaint is the virus checking of outgoing emails. In earlier versions, I was able to turn that off. I send a lot of large attachments and the delay caused by Norton 360 doing its virus check is unacceptable. It really slows me down. If NIS2009 lets me turn that off and the trial is free, I just might give Norton another chance.
Posted by Michael Gora at September 21st, 2008 at 12:18 pmI have had many headaches with anti virus programmes, they make start-up times unbearable and they slow down the computer to a crawl when they do their scan. One day a friend installed the Ubuntu operating system on my computer and I am pleased to say that it has no need for anti virus programmes. It is like having a better version of Mac, think of it as a free anti virus program that comes with all the software you need at no cost. Check it out you have nothing to loose but angst over viruses key loggers and what anti virus software to use and what websites not to visit and how you are going to pay for it all. It works why bother with anything else?
All computer viruses are Windows viruses, and only Windows computers are affected by viruses. Ubuntu and Apple computers are not affected by viruses. I wish every computer journalist would start their articles with those sentences, the public are not being informed.
Skog
Posted by peter skog at September 25th, 2008 at 10:11 amNorton Antivirus 2009 lags the browser/connection. Try it yourself, the flash game @ http://jellyjumper.com/ with & without Norton 2009. One will lag all browsers, Opera, Firefox… & without Norton 2009, things will run smoothly. Bummer.
Posted by Marko Kraljevic at November 24th, 2008 at 4:24 pm