Operating Systems Offer New Choices in PC Shopping
Now that both Microsoft and Apple have finally shipped the new versions of their operating systems, Windows 7 and Snow Leopard, respectively, it’s time for my annual fall computer-buying guide.
This guide stresses laptops, which have become the prevalent choice, but most of its specs also apply to desktops. As always, it is aimed at average consumers doing typical tasks, such as Web surfing, email, social networking, word processing, photos, video and music. It doesn’t apply to businesses, hard-core gamers or serious media producers—groups that need specialized or heftier hardware.
Consumers shopping for new computers this fall have a wide variety of choices with the new operating systems pre-installed, making the machines faster and better. Windows PCs are no longer burdened with the disliked Vista OS.
That’s the good news. The bad news is that the Windows hardware makers and retailers generally are trying to nudge you to spend more. They are anxious to guide consumers away from the popular, but low-profit, stripped-down netbooks to somewhat larger Windows 7 laptops from which they can make more money. This larger-size category goes by a variety of names, which can be confusing.
Windows vs. Mac: The arrival of Windows 7 makes PCs from Hewlett-Packard (HPQ), Dell (DELL) and others much better choices than their Vista-equipped predecessors were. Microsoft (MSFT) has closed most of the gap with Apple’s (AAPL) Mac OS X operating system. Also, Windows PCs are often priced hundreds of dollars lower than Macs, and offer many more choices.
But Apple’s hardware is stylish and sturdy, and, in my tests, Macs usually boot faster than Windows machines. Plus, Apple’s chain of retail stores offers a better buying experience and strong post-purchase support. Also, in my view, Apple’s built-in software still has the edge. Snow Leopard is fast and reliable. And it comes with a full suite of excellent built-in programs, including email, photo and video software. Microsoft has stripped Windows 7 of such programs. Some PC makers have restored some or all of these in certain models, although I consider Apple’s counterparts better. Another huge plus: The Mac isn’t susceptible to the vast majority of viruses and spyware.
Cost: Prices on Windows PCs are creeping upward. You can buy a Windows PC for under $500, but many stores are pushing costlier models. And those $250 netbooks are much scarcer. Now, they typically run between $300 and $450. Apple has mostly stuck with its same, higher, prices, though it has boosted the specs on many models. The cheapest Mac desktop, the minimalist Mac mini, is $599. The cheapest Mac laptop, the new MacBook, is $999. The heart of Apple’s line starts at $1,199.
New category: Windows PC makers this season are pushing a category of laptop that is meant to fit between a netbook and a full-size laptop. It goes by a variety of confusing names, such as “ultrathin” or “thin and light,” though these models are often no thinner or lighter than some laptops of the past. They typically cost between $500 and $800, and often have 13-inch screens.
Memory: All Macs come with at least two gigabytes of memory, which is plenty for running Snow Leopard well. Mainstream Windows PCs have at least three gigabytes. But the cheapest Windows machines sometimes come with less. I recommend at least two gigabytes.
64-bit: PCs have long been based on something called a 32-bit architecture, but many models now use a 64-bit architecture, allowing properly written software to use more memory and run faster. If possible, buy a 64-bit computer, which is likely to dominate eventually, even though some software and add-on hardware may be incompatible at first.
Graphics: The new operating systems allow software makers to speed up some tasks by offloading them from the main processor onto the graphics chip. So, if possible, get a “discrete” graphics processor, which has its own memory. Otherwise, find a potent “integrated” graphics chip, which shares your main memory.
Processor: Mainstream Windows PCs sport fast, dual-core processors from Intel (INTC) or its rival, AMD (AMD). These pack the equivalent of two brains onto one chip. But many lower-price Windows PCs have slower processors, such as the Intel Atom, which are best suited for light duty. Apple models all use Intel’s dual-core processors, except for the highest-priced desktops, which come with quad-core chips.
Hard disks: A 250-gigabyte hard disk should be the minimum on most PCs. On a netbook, look for at least a 160-gigabyte disk. Solid-state disks are faster and use less battery power, but often add hundreds of dollars to the price tag.
Touch: Windows 7 lets you control the computer by touching the screen with your fingers, and some PC makers add their own touch-screen features. But this only works fully with newer types of touch screens, adding cost. Make sure any touch-screen model you buy has a full multitouch screen that supports all Windows 7 gestures. Apple uses the laptop touch pad, or its new mouse, as the multitouch, finger-gesture mechanism, instead of the screen.
As always, don’t buy more machine than you need.
Find all of Walt Mossberg’s columns and videos online, free, at the All Things Digital Web site, walt.allthingsd.com. Email him at mossberg@wsj.com.





Comments
When I read the title I thought this was actually going to be about choice. Instead it is basically the old “Mac vs PC” argument. If you were to talk about choice you would include other operating systems, some of which come pre-installed from manufacturers.
Posted by Goran Smith at October 28th, 2009 at 9:59 pmGreat article Walt, I am also curious as to why microsoft pulled the email client from Windows 7.
MS does offer a mail client (plus movie maker and more) through Windows Live Essentials.
It’s called Windows Live Mail and after trying it, i’m convinced it’s a huge improvement over Windows Mail. Have you tried it?
I just figured out that by using hotmail + Windows Live Mail you get free sync of your contacts and calendar automatically.
No special setup or anything just put in your hotmail email address and password. I’m going to be testing this functionality over the next few weeks but it looks similar to what Apple offers through MobileMe except that it’s free.
Also, there is a photo editor built in to windows 7 called Paint.
It is an improvement over previous versions, but it isn’t as feature rich as a full blown photo editor like photoshop.
Anyways, thanks for the article I enjoyed reading it!
Posted by Luy Teitelroit at October 28th, 2009 at 10:09 pmI think “…As always, don’t buy more machine than you need….” is bad advise.
One does not know what one might want to do a year or two in the future.
Especially with laptops, it is important to think as far ahead as one can. Laptops can be modified; but it is much more difficult for the home user to work in a laptop than it is in a desktop.
I just purchased a new machine with Windows 7 and the I7 CPU. I wanted the I7 because its four cores can be hyperthreaded. For me, this means I can “crunch” on eight work units at one time from World Community Grid or other projects running BOINC software. I will not be otherwise using the machine myself. My wife will be using the machine for email, some web buying, etc., light tasks. But, knowing that this machine may come ultimately to me to replace one of my really good Core 2 Duo Vista machines, I outfitted it now for what I might want to do in the future. Thus, the I7-920 CPU, 6 gigs of DRAM, and the Blue-Ray burner/DVD burner combo.
>>RSM
Posted by Richard Mitnick at October 29th, 2009 at 7:16 amI liked the article, but I think that the time is right for an attempt to compare the cost of owning a Mac versus PC (yes, I know that this has been done many times before). I know that it is impossible to find a PC with exactly the same hardware as a Mac, and I know that the software available for Mac or PC is often hard to compare, but if people are out there shopping, they should have an idea of what it costs to own and use a computer system, not just what it costs to buy a computer.
Like many others, I use a PC at work and own Macs at home, and the 3-year cost is what convinced me that a Mac is less expensive than a PC (I am on a fairly tight budget when it comes to buying consumer electronics). I recently purchased an iMac desktop with the added $120 extended warranty, so I know exactly what my 3-year cost is for my Mac desktop.
My thoughts on cost include the time that I have to spend keeping my computer running and working with peripherals (I have an ipod, a scanner/printer and a digital camera which I want to work easily with my computer), yearly cost for virus protection and such, and cost of software for doing “family computing” (iWork, iLife, Mail, and a Mobile Me account take care of all things digital for me).
Thanks again for your thoughtful work with technology.
Posted by Andrew Freda at November 1st, 2009 at 7:01 am