<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Personal Technology &#187; JavaScript</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ptech.allthingsd.com/tag/javascript/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ptech.allthingsd.com</link>
	<description>from The Wall Street Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:24:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Apple Changes Leopard's Spots</title>
		<link>http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20090826/apple-changes-leopards-spots/</link>
		<comments>http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20090826/apple-changes-leopards-spots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 01:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter S. Mossberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macintosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walt Mossberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[32-bit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[64-bit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe Reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellular modem card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compatability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contacts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dock Expose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[files]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gigabytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grand Central Dispatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics chip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard disk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[installation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JavaScript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X 10.6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X Leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X Snow Leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacBook Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenCL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PDF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[player]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PowerPoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QuickTime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snow Leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snow Leopard Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Substitutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMWare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VPN connector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20090826/apple-changes-leopards-spots/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple's Snow Leopard operating system improves upon its predecessor, writes Walt Mossberg. But it isn't a big breakthrough for average users, and it isn't a typical Apple lust-provoking product.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a company known for breakthrough products with cool features, Apple this week is doing something unusual: It is introducing a key product with very few new features that are visible to its users. This new release, the latest major version of the Macintosh operating system, looks and works almost exactly the same as its predecessor, but has been heavily re-engineered under the covers for greater speed and efficiency, and to add future-oriented core technologies.</p>
<p>The new software, called Snow Leopard, succeeds Apple&#8217;s 2007-vintage Leopard, which I regard as the best computer operating system out there, and markedly superior to its main rival, Microsoft&#8217;s Windows Vista. Snow Leopard goes on sale Friday, Aug. 28, and will be pre-installed on all new Macintosh computers.</p>
<div class="video-wsj"><object width="380" height="216"><param name="movie" value="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><param name="flashvars" value="videoGUID=17BCE91E-8BEA-4A2D-AD59-F13135E0E335&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://wsj.vo.llnwd.net/o28/players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/"name="microflashPlayer"></param><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoGUID={17BCE91E-8BEA-4A2D-AD59-F13135E0E335}&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://wsj.vo.llnwd.net/o28/players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="microflashPlayer" width="380" height="216" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br />[ See post to watch video ]</div></object>
<p>The company, which often proclaims its new releases as revolutionary, has been very low key about Snow Leopard. For many months, Apple (AAPL) has made it clear the new OS wouldn&#8217;t sport new eye-popping features, but would instead be focused on what it calls &#8220;refinements&#8221; and &#8220;fine-tuning.&#8221; Perhaps its biggest new feature is something only a minority of Mac owners will ever use: built-in compatibility with Microsoft&#8217;s Exchange corporate email, calendar and contacts service.</p>
<p>Snow Leopard is priced accordingly, at just $29 for people upgrading from Leopard. That&#8217;s $100 less than what Leopard cost. And it&#8217;s $90 less than what Microsoft plans to charge upgraders for the main consumer version of its next version of Windows, called Windows 7, which is due out Oct. 22. Windows 7 is also an iteration on its predecessor, rather than a revolutionary new product, though it has some nice tweaks and will be a more dramatic improvement due to Vista&#8217;s failings. I&#8217;ll have a full review of it closer to its release.</p>
<div class="media-CENTER" style="width:360px;"><a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/images/PJ-AR255_PTECH_G_20090826164233.jpg" rel="lightbox" title="PTECH"><img src="http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/images/PJ-AR255_PTECH_G_20090826164233.jpg" width="360" height="240" style="float: none;" alt="PTECH" /></a>
</div>
<p>I&#8217;ve been testing Snow Leopard on three Macs—an older desktop and a laptop of my own that I upgraded from Leopard, and a new MacBook Pro laptop Apple lent me for testing with Snow Leopard pre-installed. I found Snow Leopard easy to install, faster than Leopard, compatible with my most commonly used software and peripherals, and filled with a number of small, useful refinements and additions.</p>
<p>One delightful change: Snow Leopard takes up less than half the room on a hard disk that Leopard did, and Apple says the average user who upgrades will free up about 7 gigabytes of space. On my 2008-vintage MacBook Pro, I gained back a whopping 14 gigabytes. </p>
<p>But I also encountered a number of bugs and glitches, and a few incompatibilities, including a wildly wrong guess by Snow Leopard about which driver to use for an older, lightly used printer on one of my upgraded Macs. (It did fine with my main printer.)</p>
<p>Overall, I believe Snow Leopard will help keep the Mac an appealing choice for computer buyers, and I can recommend it to existing Mac owners seeking more speed and disk space, or wanting to more easily use Exchange. But I don&#8217;t consider Snow Leopard a must-have upgrade for average consumers. It&#8217;s more of a nice-to-have upgrade. If you&#8217;re happy with Leopard, there&#8217;s no reason to rush out and get Snow Leopard.</p>
<div class="media-CENTER" style="width:262px;"><img src="http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/images/PJ-AR260_PTECHj_DV_20090826153757.jpg" width="262" height="262" alt="PTECHjp" />
</div>
<p>For some current Mac owners, Snow Leopard isn&#8217;t an option. About 20% of them are still using older models that aren&#8217;t powered by the Intel (INTC) processors Apple currently uses. Snow Leopard simply won&#8217;t work on these machines, including models designated as G4 or G5 and sold as recently as 2006.</p>
<p>And, for owners of Intel-based Macs who are still using the older Tiger version of the Mac OS, Apple is officially making Snow Leopard available only in a &#8220;boxed set&#8221; that includes other software and costs $169. The reasoning is that these folks never paid the $129 back in 2007 to upgrade to Leopard. But here&#8217;s a tip: Apple concedes that the $29 Snow Leopard upgrade will work properly on these Tiger-equipped Macs, so you can save the extra $140.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a quick rundown of what I found in testing Snow Leopard:</p>
<h5 class="subhed">Installation</h5>
<p>Snow Leopard comes in one version, rather than the multiple operating system versions favored by Microsoft (MSFT). And that single version handles hardware and software based on both a standard computer technology, called 32-bit, and a newer one, called 64-bit, which can use much more memory and is faster.</p>
<p>Both my desktop and laptop Macs converted to Snow Leopard quickly and smoothly, in about 45 minutes each. Unlike the upgrade process Microsoft is requiring to get to Windows 7 from Windows XP, the Snow Leopard upgrade preserves all your files, settings and programs where they previously existed, right down to your desktop icons and wallpaper. No disk wiping, file moving, or program re-installation is required. And, as noted above, you actually gain disk space, because Apple has slimmed down the OS and also automatically removes or compresses old system files (not your personal data) that are no longer needed or used often.</p>
<p>However, I did run into a couple of minor problems: on one of my Macs, a screen saver displaying certain of my photos didn&#8217;t work after the switch. Other photos did work. Apple says this is a bug it will fix.</p>
<h5 class="subhed">Speed</h5>
<p>After changing to Snow Leopard, my Macs worked faster. I already considered them pretty speedy, so the overall effect wasn&#8217;t mind-blowing. But Snow Leopard&#8217;s built-in programs, like Mail, the Safari browser, and the Finder—Apple&#8217;s equivalent of the Windows Explorer—have all been rewritten behind the scenes, so these and other specific features are now a lot quicker. I found that email folders stuffed with thousands of messages opened almost instantly, and copying files was noticeably faster, even when the destination was on the Internet or a network. The Safari 4 browser, already very fast with Leopard, is even speedier under Snow Leopard, especially on more complex Web sites that use a popular technology called Javascript.</p>
<h5 class="subhed">New Features</h5>
<p>True to its word, Apple has built few new features into Snow Leopard, and, except for Exchange (explained below), these are small. One touted feature is called Dock Expose, which allows you to see small versions of all the open windows in any running program by clicking on its icon in the Dock at the bottom of the screen. But this is mostly a reworking of a feature that already has been on the Mac.</p>
<p>Apple&#8217;s QuickTime video player has been upgraded, with a clean new interface for playback, and the new ability to record and trim videos. Icons can be more easily enlarged, and you can preview the files they represent, even playing videos in miniature or paging through multipage PDF or PowerPoint files.</p>
<p>My three favorite tweaks, barely mentioned by Apple: </p>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;Substitutions,&#8221; which is like the auto-correct feature in Microsoft Word, but extends the concept to Apple&#8217;s email and other programs;</li>
<li>the ability for Snow Leopard to automatically reset the time zone on the Mac&#8217;s clock based on your location while traveling;</li>
<li>and a new built-in function in QuickTime that allows you to record videos of actions you take on the Mac&#8217;s screen.</li>
</ul>
<h5 class="subhed">Exchange</h5>
<p>Although Exchange is a widely used Microsoft server product, employed by many, many companies to manage employees&#8217; email, calendars, and contacts, it isn&#8217;t built into Windows. To use Exchange, you have to buy add-on software, usually Microsoft&#8217;s Outlook for Windows PCs. It also hasn&#8217;t been built into the Mac OS, and usually required Mac owners to buy Microsoft&#8217;s Entourage program. But, with Snow Leopard, Apple is building Exchange right into the operating system, so it works with Apple&#8217;s free, built-in email, calendar and contact programs.</p>
<p>With the generous help of my company&#8217;s IT folks, I tested this feature, and it worked very well. All my corporate information flowed into Apple&#8217;s programs, very quickly, and I could search the company directory, check the calendars of people with whom I wished to schedule meetings, and more.</p>
<p>However, Apple makes setting up this new feature look simpler than it is. In most cases, I believe, it will require the time and cooperation of corporate IT personnel, who will need time to learn it—especially since, at many companies, relatively few of these folks are Mac experts. In my case, an Apple employee had to help my IT colleagues and me to get it going. But you likely won&#8217;t have that aid.</p>
<h5 class="subhed">Compatibility and Glitches</h5>
<p>Commonly used third-party programs, like the Mac versions of Microsoft Office, the Firefox browser, and Adobe Reader, all worked fine in my tests after the upgrade. But a few things didn&#8217;t. Apple admitted I had found a few bugs and said that some software makers will have to upgrade their software because the programs rely on under-the-hood components that have changed in Snow Leopard.</p>
<p>VMware&#8217;s Fusion program for running Windows simultaneously with the Mac operating system worked, and I was able to use Windows. But it was a bit glitchy. VMware (VMW) provided me with a forthcoming new version tailored for Snow Leopard&#8217;s changed underlying architecture, which worked perfectly.</p>
<p>A Cisco (CSCO) program used to connect to corporate virtual private networks caused one of my test machines to completely crash, a rarity on Macs. But Snow Leopard now contains the same Cisco VPN connector as a built-in feature, and that worked perfectly.</p>
<p>Snow Leopard didn&#8217;t properly recognize my older-model Verizon (VZ) cellular modem card, though I was still able to use the card by digging into Apple&#8217;s network preferences screen. Apple says this is a bug it will fix.</p>
<p>As noted above, Snow Leopard didn&#8217;t work at first with an older networked printer on one of my test Macs, and thought it was a laser printer instead of an inkjet. I did get it working, by manually selecting a different printer driver, but Apple admits this is a bug it will have to fix.</p>
<p>Finally, the Time Machine backup file on one of my Macs stopped working. With my permission, Apple examined the file using a diagnostic tool and claimed it had become corrupted a couple of months ago, before the upgrade, and that Snow Leopard merely exposed the problem. I have no way of knowing if this is true, but Time Machine did work perfectly on the two other test Macs.</p>
<h5 class="subhed">Underlying Technologies</h5>
<p>In addition to greater 64-bit capability, Snow Leopard has two other big under-the-hood additions. One, called Grand Central Dispatch, makes it easier for developers to write programs that make better use of the multiple &#8220;cores,&#8221; or processing units, in modern processors. The other, called OpenCL, makes it easier for developers to offload some non-graphics tasks to today&#8217;s potent graphics chips. These are very important, especially for power-hungry tasks like video production and high-end gaming, but Microsoft is building similar capabilities into Windows 7, and they won&#8217;t really matter on either platform until third-party developers make use of them, which will take time.</p>
<h5 class="subhed">Bottom Line</h5>
<p>Apple already had the best computer operating system in Leopard, and Snow Leopard makes it a little better. But it isn&#8217;t a big breakthrough for average users, and, even at $29, it isn&#8217;t a typical Apple lust-provoking product.     </p>
<p class="tagline">Find Walt Mossberg&#8217;s columns and videos online, free, at the All Things Digital Web site, <a href="http://walt.allthingsd.com">walt.allthingsd.com</a>. Email him at <a href="mailto:mossberg@wsj.com">mossberg@wsj.com</a>. </p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20090826/apple-changes-leopards-spots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Browser Wars, The New Firefox Loses Some Edge</title>
		<link>http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20090715/in-browser-warsthe-new-firefoxloses-some-edge/</link>
		<comments>http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20090715/in-browser-warsthe-new-firefoxloses-some-edge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 22:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter S. Mossberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macintosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walt Mossberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[add-on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bookmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fastest browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[format]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard disk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JavaScript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[location]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platforms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plug-in]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private browsing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safari 4.02]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spreadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tabs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[version 3.5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[word processors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20090715/in-browser-warsthe-new-firefoxloses-some-edge/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this round of the browser war, Mozilla’s product no longer stands out as clearly superior.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The war of the Web browsers has taken another turn with the release of a major new version of Mozilla Firefox, the No. 2 browser in market share, but No. 1 in the hearts of many of the most knowledgeable computer users.</p>
<div class="video-wsj"><object width="380" height="216"><param name="movie" value="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><param name="flashvars" value="videoGUID=B7544F8F-1F14-447B-94C6-BD97AA896B2A&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://wsj.vo.llnwd.net/o28/players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/"name="microflashPlayer"></param><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoGUID={B7544F8F-1F14-447B-94C6-BD97AA896B2A}&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://wsj.vo.llnwd.net/o28/players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="microflashPlayer" width="380" height="216" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br />[ See post to watch video ]</div></object>
<p>This new edition of Firefox is the third big new browser release this year, following new editions of Microsoft’s (MSFT) Internet Explorer and Apple’s (AAPL) Safari. Unlike Firefox, these two browsers come bundled with the two major computer platforms, Windows and Mac. By contrast, Mozilla must convince users to download Firefox, which comes in essentially identical versions for both systems. And it has done a reasonably good job, garnering by most estimates around 23% market share, versus between 60% and 70% for IE, which is by far the leader. Meanwhile, Google (GOOG)—a former Firefox supporter—has joined the battle with its nascent Chrome browser, which so far runs only on Windows, but is due on the Mac one day and is to morph into a whole new operating system next year. And there are other very capable browsers with small user bases, the most notable of which is Opera.</p>
<p>I’ve been using Firefox since its inception years ago, and have been testing this latest iteration, version 3.5, since it emerged June 30. I can continue to recommend it as a fine way to surf the Web. The new version is improved, and worked very well for me on both my Windows and Macintosh computers.</p>
<p>But, in this round of the war, Mozilla’s product no longer stands out as clearly superior, for two reasons. First, Firefox has lost its traditionally biggest advantage: greater speed than its rivals. While Firefox 3.5 is about twice as fast as the previous version 3.0, and handily beat Internet Explorer 8 in my tests, it lagged behind both Safari 4.02 and the beta edition of Chrome 2.0 a bit in most test scenarios. Overall, Safari was fastest in most of my tests, both on Mac and Windows (yes, Apple makes a little-known version of Safari for Windows).</p>
<p>In fact, Mozilla no longer is claiming to be the fastest browser. It now prefers to say it is one of what it calls the “modern” browsers, along with Safari and Chrome, whose under-the-hood technologies make them better at handling a growing breed of sophisticated Internet-based applications that mimic traditional computer programs like photo editors and word processors and spreadsheets.</p>
<p>Second, this version of Firefox has relatively few new features, and some of them are merely catch-ups to those introduced earlier by Microsoft and Apple. Most notable among these is a private browsing mode, first popularized in Safari, and greatly expanded in IE, which allows you to traverse Web sites without leaving traces on your computer to show what you’ve been doing.</p>
<p>Mozilla says its main goal from now on will be to turn Firefox into the ideal platform for running Web-based applications. It shares the belief, also fervently embraced by Google, that consumers will gradually migrate away from programs stored on their computers’ hard disks to those stored in “the Cloud,” the industry’s term for the servers that run the Internet.</p>
<p>To show this, the new Firefox can do a few new tricks, like streaming video directly from Web pages without requiring plug-ins like Adobe’s (ADBE) Flash. Alas, this works only with obscure video formats little used on the Web at the moment.</p>
<p>Firefox 3.5 does include some new features, in addition to private browsing. It can pinpoint your location, so that any properly configured Web site can serve up locally relevant content. It has a nice option that lets you “forget” any Web page in your history, wiping out all traces you’ve been there, even if you neglected to turn on private browsing mode beforehand. And it can recover your open tabs after a crash.</p>
<p>Also, Firefox continues to lead its rivals in the number and variety of third-party add-ons that enhance browsing in myriad ways, such as adding features to sites like Twitter or making bookmarking easier.</p>
<p>As for speed, I tested Firefox 3.5 against its main rivals by timing how long it took to launch into the same home page, and how long it took to completely load popular Web sites like Facebook and YouTube. I tested how long it took to completely load folders containing numerous sports and news sites simultaneously. I also ran an industry benchmark test that measures the browsers’ speed at handling an important Web language called JavaScript. I did these tests on the same home network on both a Dell (DELL) and an Apple computer.</p>
<p>While Firefox won a few of these tests, Safari and Chrome won more of them. In most cases, the speed differences weren’t large, except in the case of IE, which was dramatically slower than the others. But this is the first new version of Firefox I’ve tested that didn’t win most of the tests.</p>
<p>Firefox is still a great Web browser, and still much faster than its main rival, Internet Explorer. But its edge is being eroded.</p>
<p class="tagline">Find all of Walt Mossberg’s columns and videos online, free, at the All Things Digital Web site, <a href="http://walt.allthingsd.com">walt.allthingsd.com</a>. Email him at <a href="mailto:mossberg@wsj.com">mossberg@wsj.com</a>.</p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20090715/in-browser-warsthe-new-firefoxloses-some-edge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Test of Google's New Browser</title>
		<link>http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20080902/first-test-of-googles-new-browser/</link>
		<comments>http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20080902/first-test-of-googles-new-browser/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter S. Mossberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macintosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walt Mossberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accelerator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[address bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bookmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compatibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compatibility View button]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gigabyte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[icon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Incognito]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InPrivate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JavaScript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lenovo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Major League Baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[menu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Omnibox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private browsing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search term]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surfing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tab-to-Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tabs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ThinkPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toolbar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Slices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20080902/first-test-of-googles-new-browser/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google's new Chrome Web browser will make using the Internet faster and less frustrating, but this first version is rough around the edges and lacks some features, says Walt Mossberg in the first hands-on review.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://online.wsj.com/quotes/main.html?type=djn&#038;symbol=goog'>Google</a> has introduced a new Web browser, called Chrome, aimed at wresting dominance of the browser market from <a href='http://online.wsj.com/quotes/main.html?type=djn&#038;symbol=msft'>Microsoft</a>&#8217;s Internet Explorer. The move takes the Google-Microsoft rivalry to a whole new level. If Google succeeds, it will be a big deal, with major ramifications for the future of the Web.</p>
<p>But just how good is Chrome? How does it differ from IE and from less popular, but still important, browsers like Mozilla&#8217;s Firefox and <a href='http://online.wsj.com/quotes/main.html?type=djn&#038;symbol=aapl'>Apple</a>&#8217;s Safari?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been testing Chrome for about a week, trying out all its features and using it side by side with Microsoft&#8217;s latest iteration of IE, which came out just last week.</p>
<div class="video-wsj"><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoGUID={1770021405}&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://wsj.vo.llnwd.net/o28/players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="microflashPlayer" width="320" height="240" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br />[ See post to watch video ]</div>
<p>My verdict: Chrome is a smart, innovative browser that, in many common scenarios, will make using the Web faster, easier and less frustrating. But this first version &#8212; which is just a beta, or test, release &#8212; is rough around the edges and lacks some common browser features Google plans to add later. These omissions include a way to manage bookmarks, a command for emailing links and pages directly from the browser, and even a progress bar to show how much of a Web page has loaded.</p>
<p>Chrome&#8217;s interface has some bold changes from the standard browser design. These new features enhance the Web experience, but they will require some adjustment on the part of users. For instance, Chrome does away with most menus and toolbar icons to give maximum screen space for the Web pages themselves. Also, Google has merged the address bar, where you type in Web addresses, with the search box, where you type in search terms. This unified feature is called the Omnibox.</p>
<p>One striking difference in Chrome is how it handles tabs, which display a single Web page. In Chrome, each tab behaves as a separate browser. The bookmarks bar, Omnibox, menus and toolbar icons are located inside the tab, rather than atop the entire browser. The tabs appear at the top of the computer screen. Chrome also groups related tabs. If you open a new tab from a link in a page that&#8217;s already open, that new tab appears next to the originating page, rather than at the end of the row of tabs.</p>
<p>Despite Google&#8217;s claims that Chrome is fast, it was notably slower in my tests at the common task of launching Web pages than either Firefox or Safari. However, it proved faster than the latest version of IE &#8212; also a beta version &#8212; called IE8.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Microsoft hasn&#8217;t been sitting still. The second beta version of IE8 is the best edition of Internet Explorer in years. It is packed with new features of its own, some of which are similar to those in Chrome, and some of which, in my view, top Chrome&#8217;s features.</p>
<div class="media-RIGHT" style="width: 257px;"><a href="http://online.wsj.com/media/WSJ_PTECH2_090208.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/images/OB-CF589_ptech__NS_20080902211441.jpg" alt="Google Chrome" height="186" width="257" /></a><br />Google&#8217;s Chrome browser displays thumbnails of a user&#8217;s most-visited pages when a new tab is opened, rather than a blank page.</div>
<p>For example, while IE8 also groups related tabs, it assigns a different color to each such tab group and allows you to close them all with one click. It has a &#8220;smart&#8221; address box of its own, that drops down a list of suggestions as you type, though it retains a separate search box.</p>
<p>IE8 also has breakthrough privacy features that exceed Chrome&#8217;s, and includes a new technology called Accelerators, which allows you to take rapid action on any selected word or phrase on a Web page, such as generating a map for a place name, without switching to a new page.</p>
<p>As they develop, each of these browsers has a good chance of besting Firefox 3.0, which I have regarded as the best Web browser for Windows, the only operating system on which Chrome currently runs. But they will have to get faster at loading pages. And, to best Firefox on the Macintosh, Google will have to make good on its promise to produce a Mac version of Chrome, something it says it will do in the coming months. Microsoft has no plans to produce a Mac version of IE8.</p>
<p>Chrome and IE8 are far more advanced than Apple&#8217;s Safari. Safari is speedy on both Mac and Windows platforms, but lacks many of the key intelligent features of its newer Google and Microsoft rivals.</p>
<p>Why is Google igniting a new browser war? There are two main reasons, and both involve competing with Microsoft. First, the search giant fears that because its search engine and other major products depend on the browser, Microsoft &#8212; with its rival online products &#8212; might be able to gain an advantage by altering the design of IE, which has roughly a 75% market share.</p>
<p>Second, and more important, Google sees the Web as a platform for the software programs, or applications, that currently run directly on computer operating systems, notably Microsoft&#8217;s Windows. It says current browsers lack the underlying architecture to enable future, more powerful Web applications that will rely more heavily on a common Web programming language called JavaScript. Chrome was designed to be the world&#8217;s speediest browser at handling JavaScript.</p>
<p>That move might one day make Chrome a sort of online operating system that competes with Windows. &#8220;Think of Chrome as more than a simple Web browser,&#8221; Google declares. &#8220;It&#8217;s a platform for running Web applications.&#8221;</p>
<div class="media-LEFT" style="width: 257px;"><a href="http://online.wsj.com/media/WSJ_PTECH2_090208.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/images/OB-CF590_ptech2_NS_20080902211553.jpg" alt="Google Chrome" height="186" width="257" /></a><br />Microsoft&#8217;s IE8 has an &#8220;Accelerator&#8221; feature that lets users select any Web text and then map, translate, search or email their selection without leaving the page.</div>
<p>I tested Chrome, and IE8, on a plain-vanilla Lenovo ThinkPad laptop running Windows XP, and equipped with a modest processor and one gigabyte of memory.</p>
<p>To gauge Chrome&#8217;s speed at loading Web pages, I launched two large groups of typical Web pages simultaneously, each site opening in its own tab. One group included 15 sports sites, the second 19 news sites. In both tests, Chrome&#8217;s speed fell in the middle, at 35 and 44 seconds, respectively. IE8 was slower, taking 49 and 75 seconds to open the two groups of sites. But Firefox and Safari were much faster, notching identical speeds of 19 seconds for the 15 sites and 28 seconds for the 19 sites.</p>
<p>Google claims that future, more sophisticated Web applications relying more heavily on JavaScript than today&#8217;s sites do would run faster on Chrome. Of course, I couldn&#8217;t test any claim about future scenarios, but I did run Chrome on several JavaScript test sites, used by developers. It handily beat the other browsers. However, Google doesn&#8217;t claim users would see much difference on current Web application sites.</p>
<p>I also tested Chrome&#8217;s compatibility with scores of common Web sites. In general, it did well, rendering the sites properly. But I ran into problems with video. Some video sites refused to recognize Chrome, because its development has been a secret. On others, like Major League Baseball&#8217;s site, videos mostly played properly, but sometimes didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>IE8 also has some compatibility issues, for different reasons. It&#8217;s the first version of Internet Explorer to hew closely to Web standards. Earlier versions used some nonstandard ways of rendering Web sites, prompting some site designers to adopt techniques that made their pages work in IE, but look odd in Firefox and Safari. Now, ironically, these pages also look strange in IE8. So Microsoft was forced to build in a special Compatibility View button that users must click to see the sites properly.</p>
<p>Chrome is built on three core design principles. The first is its spare user interface: just two menus and a handful of toolbar icons. IE introduced a similar approach in its version 7, but with a difference. Microsoft allows users to restore a traditional menu bar; Google doesn&#8217;t. The only toolbar icon you can add in Chrome is a Home button.</p>
<p>The second principle is that a user can type anything into a single place, the Omnibox, and instantly get suggestions on where to go, gleaned from the user&#8217;s own browsing history and Google&#8217;s rankings of popular sites. Whether you type in a Web address or a search term, the Omnibox is very smart. In my tests, it sometimes came up with the right destination after I typed only one or two letters of the name of a site I often visited.</p>
<p>The Omnibox has another cool feature: Tab-to-Search. If you type in the name of another site that includes its own search feature, like Amazon.com, the Omnibox lets you just press the tab key to search within that site, without opening it first. Chrome, through its Options settings, also lets you change the default search engine used by the Omnibox. Instead of Google&#8217;s own search service, you can use Microsoft&#8217;s Live search, Yahoo search, or others.</p>
<p>The third big principle behind Chrome is that each tab runs, under the hood, as a separate browser. Tabs can be dragged off the main browser and turned into separate windows. If one tab crashes, the rest of the browser keeps running. But this doesn&#8217;t work perfectly. In my tests, all of Chrome died on me when I tried watching an Olympics video on the NBC site.</p>
<p>You can even make a tab a standalone application that runs from the Start Menu, or the desktop, as if it was a separate program.</p>
<p>Chrome has a few other key features. When you open a new tab, you don&#8217;t get a blank page, but a set of thumbnails for your most-visited pages, plus lists of recent search engines you&#8217;ve used, recently used bookmarks and recently closed tabs.</p>
<p>Like other browsers, Chrome puts up a warning when you try to visit a malicious or phony Web site, and it has a private browsing mode, called Incognito, which allows you to browse without leaving any history on your computer &#8212; a feature popularized in Safari.</p>
<p>Chrome also has a pop-up blocker, but it&#8217;s annoying because it flashes a notice that a pop-up has been blocked. IE also does this, but unlike in Chrome, the warnings are much less intrusive.</p>
<p>Internet Explorer 8 has some new features Chrome lacks. Its private browsing mode, called InPrivate, is the first I&#8217;ve seen that not only leaves no traces on your own computer, but also bars Web sites from collecting some types of information on where you&#8217;ve previously been surfing.</p>
<p>While IE8&#8217;s address box and search box remain separate, each also offers rapid suggestions; and both are organized better than Chrome&#8217;s. For instance, the suggestions that drop down from its address bar are divided neatly into categories drawn from the browser&#8217;s own guess, your history and your favorites. One downside: For this to work in Windows XP, you must first install Microsoft&#8217;s desktop search product.</p>
<p>Like Chrome, IE8 lets you switch your default search provider, but it also allows you to switch search engines on the fly. When you type in a search term, icons for alternate search engines appear at the bottom of the suggestion list, and you need only click on these to see search results from, say, Google, instead of Microsoft&#8217;s own Live search engine.</p>
<p>IE8&#8217;s Accelerators feature presents a blue-arrow icon above any text on a Web page that you have selected. Clicking on the icon brings up a list of actions you can take using the selected text, such as posting it to a blog, emailing it, mapping it or searching it. While these actions are set by default to use Microsoft&#8217;s own Web services, you can change them to use Google&#8217;s, Yahoo&#8217;s, or those from other companies.</p>
<p>Microsoft also has built in a feature called Web Slices. These are portions of a Web site that a site developer can designate to appear in the IE8 Favorites bar and to constantly update themselves. An example might be bidding on eBay.</p>
<p>Like Chrome, IE8 also displays useful information whenever you create a new tab, including a list of recently closed tabs and a list of Accelerators.</p>
<p>With the emergence of Chrome, consumers have a new and innovative browser choice, and with IE8, the new browser war is sure to be a worthy contest.</p>
<p><em>Find all of Walt Mossberg&#8217;s columns and videos online, free, at the All Things Digital Web site, <a href="http://walt.allthingsd.com" rel="external">walt.allthingsd.com</a>. Email him at <a href="mailto:mossberg@wsj.com" rel="external">mossberg@wsj.com</a>.</em></p>
<span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsPreviousSiblings"></span><span class="fdPrintIncludeParentsChildren"></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20080902/first-test-of-googles-new-browser/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
